Not that anyone has asked me, but this morning I was thinking about what it would take to save YouTube. As we know, YouTube is bleeding money and the advertising model is not going to cover the enormous bandwidth costs. So to deviate from my normal posts about emerging marketing opportunities and examples I’ll offer my thoughts:
Those are three ways to monetize YouTube which I am sure Google has already worked through and figured out why they won’t work. But I thought I would share my thinking on the issue — it would be a shame if we lose YouTube.
ADDED: I was thinking I bit more about this an wanted to see how the math would work out. In March 2009 YouTube had 89MM Uniques and the average time people watch online videos is 190 minutes per month (source: Neilson – that’s for all video not just YouTube but we’ll use that number since YouTube is the majority). If we give away 120 minutes for free that would leave these 89MM viewers, on average, with 30 minutes to pay for. If YouTube charges $0.01 per minutes we would have $0.01 x 30 minutes X 89MM = $26.7MM per month. They are estimated to lose ~$450MM in 2009. This would give them $320MM of that. If the consumer behavior stays the same when they have to pay — which we know won’t happen. But its an option.
There has been a ton of press on Twitter in the last couple months. So much so that Oprah has now done a show all about Twitter. She does a great job of explaining what Twitter is in the above YouTube clip. As marketers here are a couple things to keep in mind:
http://www.comscore.com/blog/2009/04/twitter_traffic_explodes.html
http://www.comscore.com/blog/2009/04/breaking_news_and_making_news.html
http://www.chrisbrogan.com/50-ideas-on-using-twitter-for-business/