<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Chrome OS changes everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internet-marketing-db.com/2009/07/googles-chrome-os-changes-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internet-marketing-db.com/2009/07/googles-chrome-os-changes-everything/</link>
	<description>Definitions, Examples, and Case Studies of Online Marketing Strategies by Rob Walker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:58:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top Toad</title>
		<link>http://www.internet-marketing-db.com/2009/07/googles-chrome-os-changes-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Toad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internet-marketing-db.com/?p=453#comment-807</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a somewhat less optimistic position here: 
http://www.techonadime.net/2009/07/is-google-getting-ready-to-do-evil.html

I like your take, though.  I&#039;m actually not sure that I want all desktop apps to go away.  I&#039;m more in favor of a distributed system where hardware can exist anywhere the user wants it to but the access to that hardware is a common interface.  For example, if I want to have my own server at home, I can.  Access to it would look exactly like access to a Google Docs file system - indistinguishable.  I like the richness of the fat desktop environment and the portability of the cloud, and think the two should be combined in some fashion.

I liken the &quot;cloud hype&quot; to the days when everybody predicted the end of mainframes and the rise of client-server computing.  What did we end up with?  A hybrid solution.  There are just some things that dedicated hardware does better than hardware accessed through a layer of abstraction (such as a browser, virtual OS, etc)...just like there are some things mainframes do better than x86 servers.

Top Toad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a somewhat less optimistic position here:<br />
<a href="http://www.techonadime.net/2009/07/is-google-getting-ready-to-do-evil.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.techonadime.net');" rel="nofollow">http://www.techonadime.net/2009/07/is-google-getting-ready-to-do-evil.html</a></p>
<p>I like your take, though.  I&#8217;m actually not sure that I want all desktop apps to go away.  I&#8217;m more in favor of a distributed system where hardware can exist anywhere the user wants it to but the access to that hardware is a common interface.  For example, if I want to have my own server at home, I can.  Access to it would look exactly like access to a Google Docs file system &#8211; indistinguishable.  I like the richness of the fat desktop environment and the portability of the cloud, and think the two should be combined in some fashion.</p>
<p>I liken the &#8220;cloud hype&#8221; to the days when everybody predicted the end of mainframes and the rise of client-server computing.  What did we end up with?  A hybrid solution.  There are just some things that dedicated hardware does better than hardware accessed through a layer of abstraction (such as a browser, virtual OS, etc)&#8230;just like there are some things mainframes do better than x86 servers.</p>
<p>Top Toad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
